Analysis of Analytical Discrimination Essay -- Essays Papers

synopsis of Analytical Discrimination If one was required to put a rendering on analytical discrimination, what would it mean? In the article Discrimination is a virtue, author Robert Keith Miller discoursees the rule book discrimination and its true meanings, stating it as that knowing a difference. So if the question were asked once again, would it be attainable to discriminate the appeals used in analytical analysis? Miller presents us stories and examples to point out a lost definition of a word often overheard, but never studied. His use of appeals sides with tidings, discriminates against ethos, and makes anti-pathos a reality. His writing appeals to the mind, going away much to ponder, though these thoughts may be lost in the whirlwind of sign ideas thrown into a paperback debate. This article focuses on different situations to discuss the problems within. This topical discussion is effective being as there argon no two clear sides for argu ment, and no steps to concluding a definite answer. This articles presentation leaves it open for logos, the writer take careingly shuns or does not have the use of ethos and pathos. Miller has written for Newsweek, where this article comes from. He has likewise written writing handbooks, such as Motives for Writing (McGraw-Hill) and Hodges HarBrace Handbook (Harcourt College Publishers). He is an educator in argument techniques, writing Informed Argument A Multidisciplinary Reader and Guide. The audience for his article is sight of open mind and education. His appeals to system of logic show a need to take apart his examples and examine them to honor their meanings. When he presents his ideas, there is a need to understand each situation, and... ...f logos is a main theme in the argument. Miller needs people to think about what he is presenting to have an effect on them. To a concentrated audience, his appeals make a good impression and even rough ly realizations. An argument that offers a change in a language may come as hard for the reader to understand, but Miller presents examples in which he change makes sense to arouse the readers mind. This use of examples may be rampant and unconnected in some aspects, but all do serve the main purpose and relate to the main argument. Millers techniques form an informative and interesting essay. I believe that he has name his purpose and offered his point in the best possible way considering the theatre matter. In interpreting his essay, Millers own words seem to sum it up best Let us be open-minded by all means, but not so open-minded that our brains thole out.